Robert Fadem Mary O. Fadem v. United States of America, (Three Cases)
Opinion
Opinion
29 F.3d 631 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert FADEM; Mary O. Fadem, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. (Three Cases) Nos. 92-56400, 92-56404, 92-56407. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1994. * Decided June 22, 1994. Before: BRIGHT ** , WIGGINS, T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 This case involves a land dispute between owners of high desert property in southern California and the Bureau of Land Management ("BLM"). Several actions instituted by the Fadems ("Appellants") were consolidated before the district court. We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court did not finally dispose of one of the consolidated actions. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 3 On December 9, 1983, Appellants filed a trespass and conversion complaint in a California court against agents and employees of the BLM for the taking of steel culverts and culvert…