Louis Juan Diaz v. Multnomah County

29 F.3d 631 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis Juan DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35342. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 6, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis Juan Diaz appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants in this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Diaz alleged violations of his constitutional rights stemming from his prosecution in federal court for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and the termination of his employment at U.S. West Communications. We review de novo, Darring v. Kincheloe, 783 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1986), and we affirm. 3 * Discovery 4 Diaz argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his request for an enlargement of time to conduct discovery and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) motion to stay summary judgment to…