John Gallo v. Allstate Insurance Company

Good Law
29 F.3d 631·1994 WL 283660·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26053
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 199493-56484California1,437 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 631 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John GALLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56484. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 24, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Gallo appeals pro se the magistrate judge's order granting defendant Allstate Insurance Company's ("Allstate") motion for judgment on the pleadings. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo a judgment on the pleadings. See Bagley v. CMC Real Estate Corp., 923 F.2d 758, 760 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1161 (1992). "Judgment on the pleadings is proper when it is clearly established that there are no issues of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Id. "We accept all allegations of fact by the party opposing the motion as true, and construe those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.