Charles Jerome Easley v. D.L. Jett

29 F.3d 631 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Jerome EASLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.L. JETT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17096. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 30, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Charles Jerome Easley appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against defendants Jett, Whitely and Baker pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Easley also appeals the district court's dismissal of defendants Iten, Bunnell, Bruce and Moore as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). Easley contends that defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by depriving him of conjugal visits and access to a prison industries job based on a prior disciplinary violation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's…