Edward Anthony Gonzales v. Butte County Jail

Good Law
29 F.3d 631·1994 WL 369296·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26056
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 199493-16811California403 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 631 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward Anthony GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BUTTE COUNTY JAIL, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16811. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 14, 1994. * Decided July 14, 1994. Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner Edward Anthony Gonzales appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner seeks relief from a conviction for forgery in the Butte County Superior Court of California, case number 85687, and a charge of grand theft firearm and possession of a firearm by an ex-felon, case number 109174, also in the Butte County Superior Court. 3 On September 14, 1992, after a mistrial occurred, the Superior Court dismissed case number 109174 upon motion by the prosecution. Therefore, the issue with respect to that case is moot. 4 With respect to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.