Echols v. Yukon Telephone Co., Inc.

29 F.3d 631 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William L. ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YUKON TELEPHONE CO., INC.; National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.; the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Assoc. Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-36071. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 16, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William L. Echols appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment and his two motions for reconsideration of that order in his action against the Yukon Telephone Co., et al ("Yukon"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 On March 28, 1990, Echols filed his complaint in district court against Yukon alleging various causes of action arising out of his termination of employment. On July 26, 1991, the district court rendered a…