Hayhurst v. Kuthy

29 F.3d 632 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald C. HAYHURST, N.M.D., Ph.D, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim KUTHY, individually and as an agent for Douglas County Sheriff's Dept.; Jerry Maple, individually and as agent for Douglas County Sheriff's Dept.; Wayne Fazzino, individually and as agent for Douglas County District Attorney Office; Douglas County Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16783. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 6, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald Hayhurst appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Jerry Maple, the Sheriff of Douglas County, Nevada, and two Douglas County investigators in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that the defendants authored a police report containing false statements. A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872…