Richard C.S. Ho v. Patricia Born Cedric Roldan David Goodspeed

29 F.3d 632 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard C.S. HO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia BORN; Cedric Roldan; David Goodspeed, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16580. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 22, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard C.S. Ho, an adult corrections officer employed by the State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety, appeals the district court's judgment on the pleadings in favor of three internal affairs officers with the Department of Public Safety in Ho's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that he was subjected to an unlawful search. The district court found that Ho's action was barred by Hawaii's two-year statute of limitations governing personal injury actions. We review de novo, 3550 Stevens Creek Assoc. v. Barclays Bank, 915 F.2d 1355, 1357 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 917 (1991), and we affirm. 3 Ho contends that the…