Douglas L. Hadsell v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Douglas L. Hadsell v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent

Good Law
29 F.3d 632
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 199493-35018California1,205 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 632 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas L. HADSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Douglas L. HADSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-36827, 93-35018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 18, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals Douglas Hadsell, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motions for preliminary injunction which were filed in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. On September 28, 1992, Hadsell filed a motion for a temporary restraining order requesting an injunction enjoining the defendants from preventing him from voting. Hadsell subsequently filed another motion seeking injunctive relief from various prison practices which allegedly restrict his access…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.