Rosendo Jauregui v. J. Martinez, Warden Grant Woods, Attorney General

29 F.3d 632 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rosendo JAUREGUI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. MARTINEZ, Warden; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15598. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 20, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rosendo Jauregui, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Henry v. Estelle, 993 F.2d 1423, 1425 (9th Cir.1993), and affirm in part and vacate and remand in part. 3 When a prisoner challenges the fact or duration of his or her confinement, the exclusive federal remedy is a writ of habeas corpus. Heck v. Humphrey, 62 U.S.L.W. 4594 , 4595 (U.S. June 24, 1994); Badea v. Cox, 931 F.2d 573, 574 (9th Cir.1991). In contrast, when a prisoner…