David W. Jamison v. Samuel A. Lewis

29 F.3d 632 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David W. JAMISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-16084. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 20, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David W. Jamison, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging his convictions for sexual assault, aggravated assault and kidnapping of Karen Midgette, and for simple assault of Joella McKune. Jamison claims that he was denied his: (1) Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel at trial; and (2) due process rights when the district court granted respondents' motions for extensions of time. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Hendricks v. Zenon, 993 F.2d 664, 668 (9th Cir.1993) and affirm. 1. Ineffective assistance of…