Marcos Harris v. Samuel A. Lewis, Superintendent Attorney General of the State of Arizona

29 F.3d 632 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marcos HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Superintendent; Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-16301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1994. * Decided June 16, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, POOLE, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marcos Harris, an Arizona state prisoner serving a forty-eight-year sentence for manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated assault, and theft, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. The district court found that all of his claims were procedurally barred. We review his claims de novo, Adams v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835, 843 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1818 (1993), and AFFIRM. I. PROCEDURAL BAR 3 The state contends that all of Harris's claims are procedurally barred because Harris failed to comply with various state procedural rules. State courts…