In Re Robert A. Nelson, Debtor. Mercedes Williams v. Robert A. Nelson

Good Law
29 F.3d 633·1994 WL 389751·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26126
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 199493-15874California2,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Robert A. NELSON, Debtor. Mercedes WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert A. NELSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15874. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 26, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Creditor Mercedes Williams appeals pro se the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's judgment in favor of Chapter 7 debtor Robert A. Nelson in Williams' adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 * Sufficiency of Appellant's Brief 4 Nelson contends that Williams' appellate brief does not comply with Fed.R.App.P. 28 and 9th Cir.R. 28 1 because it allegedly is unintellible and does not contain citations to evidence and that these deficiencies are "sufficient grounds for this court to affirm the judgment below." We disagree. 5 Federal appellate rules require that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.