Milton v. Hullar

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. E.O. MILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodore L. HULLAR; Peter Linz; Norman Matloff; Robert Cello; Ralph Algazi; Ray Krone; Richard Walters; Manfred Ruschitzka; Carol Cartwright; Ken Joy; Larry Vanderhoff, Defendants- Appellees. No. 92-15400. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 10, 1993. * Decided July 11, 1994. 1 Before: REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, ** Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 E.O. Milton appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the appellees, members of the faculty and administration at the University of California at Davis. Milton filed an action against the appellees in their individual capacities pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, alleging that his federal constitutional rights were violated when he was not appointed to the faculty of the new Division of Computer Science at Davis. In his…