Mark Steven Price v. Joseph M. Arpaio

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark Steven PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph M. ARPAIO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15109. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 25, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state detainee Mark Steven Price, a pretrial detainee classified for maximum security, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal prior to issuance and service of process of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his civil rights by denying him contact visits with family and friends. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Oscar v. University Students Co-Operative Ass'n, 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 655 (1992), and affirm. 3 Price does not dispute the fact that he has no constitutional right to contact visits. Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S.…