Ralph A. Merten v. The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph A. MERTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK), Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56442. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 24, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ralph A. Merten appeals pro se the district court's orders (1) granting the National Railroad Passenger Corporation's ("Amtrak") motion for partial summary judgment on Merten's claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 621-34 , and Article I, Section 7 of the California Constitution, 1 and (2) dismissing for failure to comply with the district court's local rules Merten's claim for violations of the California Public Utilities Code. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We reverse and remand. 3 * ADEA and California Constitutional Claims 4 We review de novo the…