Naimish D. Parikh v. City and County of Honolulu

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Naimish D. PARIKH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15135. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 6, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Naimish D. Parikh appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants. In his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, Parikh alleged that he was unconstitutionally detained by the Honolulu Police Department. The district court found that some defendants were entitled to qualified immunity and other defendants were not subject to section 1983 liability. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 1 3 This court can affirm the decision of the district court on any ground finding support in the record. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied,…