Joseph S. Pritchett v. City of Seattle Norward J. Brooks, Sr., Individually and as City Comptroller for the City of Seattle, Washington

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph S. PRITCHETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SEATTLE; Norward J. Brooks, Sr., individually and as City Comptroller for the City of Seattle, Washington, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-36203. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 6, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joseph Pritchett appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the defendants, the City of Seattle and Norward Brooks ("Mr. Brooks"), in Pritchett's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action arising from his termination as an assistant systems analyst with the City Comptroller's Office. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Pritchett was employed by defendant City of Seattle in the Comptroller's Office until he resigned on March 30, 1990. It is undisputed that on March 16, 1990, Mr. Brooks called Pritchett into his office…