Steven Madison v. St. Francis Medical Center

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven MADISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15494. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 21, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven G. Madison appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of St. Francis Medical Center (St. Francis). Madison contends that the district court erred by (1) determining that his claims were preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (section 301), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185 (a); and (2) denying him leave to amend his complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 In November 1990, the Hawaii Nurses' Association Collective Bargaining Organization (HNA) responded to Madison's request for information regarding employment opportunities for registered nurses in the Honolulu…