Tommy Martin, Jr. v. J.D. Swinson, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tommy MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.D. SWINSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17177. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 16, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tommy Martin, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Martin contends that the district court erred by finding that the defendants have provided Martin adequate medical care. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's summary judgment, Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 241-2 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 3 "Summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party presents evidence that shows that no genuine issue of material…