Ahmed Michael Pinkston v. L. Garcia

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ahmed Michael PINKSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. GARCIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-169995. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 30, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Ahmed M. Pinkston appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing six out of nine defendants he named in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Pinkston contends that defendants, who are employees of the Corcoran prison facility, violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by forcing him to endure unconstitutional living conditions. We lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. 3 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , we have jurisdiction over appeals from final orders of the district court. A district court order dismissing an action as to only some of the defendants is not a final…