Darrell L. Maxey v. Alex M. Astorga

29 F.3d 633 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrell L. MAXEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alex M. ASTORGA; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16952. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 6, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darrell Lavel Maxey appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. In his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, Maxey alleged that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. The district court found that Maxey received medical care for his injury that far exceeded constitutional minimums. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 "A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo to determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there exist any genuine issue of material fact and whether the district court…