Richard R. Scott v. Sergeant Gier State of Washington Chase Riveland

Good Law
29 F.3d 634·1994 WL 283621·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26141
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 199493-35629California1,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard R. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant GIER; State of Washington; Chase Riveland, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35629. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 24, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert R. Scott, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant prison officials in Scott's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Scott alleged that defendants violated his constitutional right to privacy by retaining possession of a videotape of a body search of Scott. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam), and affirm. 3 Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that no genuine issues of material fact remain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.