Silas v. Roche

Good Law
29 F.3d 634·1994 WL 389779·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26159
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 199493-55951California1,348 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Morris SILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim ROCHE, San Diego County Sheriff, El Cajon Mayor, Director of Corrections, Geraldine Gurns, Channel 8 News, Channel 10 News, County of San Diego, S. Anderson, L.L. Moreno (O'Connor), Doug Moore, Jan Ronis, Daniel Neustrom, Robert Sams, II, Lloyd Harmon, Jr., R.W. Robinson, Parole Board of State of California, Board of Prison Terms, Internal Affairs Sheriff's Dept., San Diego Sheriff's Dept., L. Declesis, El Cajon Superior Court, Michael McGlin, Michael Grenburg, Victor Bianchini, Donald Meloche, Does, 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55951. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 26, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James Morris Silas, a former California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985(3)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.