Paul A. Redd, Jr. v. Charles Marshall

Good Law
29 F.3d 634·1994 WL 279230·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26133
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 199493-15578California2,347 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul A. REDD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15578. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 17, 1994. * Decided June 22, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Paul A. Redd, Jr. appeals pro se the District Court's grant of summary judgment for Appellee Charles Marshall, the warden of Pelican Bay State Prison, in Redd's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Redd's claim alleged violation of his constitutional rights when prison officials prevented Redd from consulting privately with his counsel before Redd's parole suitability hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Paul A. Redd, Jr. was convicted in 1976 of first degree murder while armed with a deadly weapon and with use of a firearm. Redd is currently serving a life sentence in a Security Housing Unit of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.