Robert W. Shepard v. Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical

29 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert W. SHEPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TELEDYNE RYAN AERONAUTICAL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56464. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 16, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert W. Shepard appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical ("Teledyne") in Shepard's employment discrimination action. Shepard contends Teledyne discriminated against him on account of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 621-34 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. Lindahl v. Air France, 930 F.2d 1434, 1436 (9th Cir.1991). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we must determine whether there are any genuine issues…