United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Derek Anderson, Defendant-Petitioner

29 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Derek ANDERSON, Defendant-Petitioner. No. 93-35025. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 6, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Derek Anderson, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion challenging his conviction following a guilty plea for distribution of cocaine in violation 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Anderson contends that the superseding indictment is defective. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review the denial of a Sec. 2255 motion de novo. United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm. 1 3 Anderson contends that the superseding indictment is defective, and that the district court thus erred in denying his Sec. 2255 motion. This contention lacks merit. 4…