United States v. Raymond Bingham

29 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond BINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50489. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1994. * Decided June 22, 1994. MEMORANDUM ** Before: FLETCHER, CANBY, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 Raymond Bingham was found to have participated in a cocaine distribution organization that operated from two apartments in the same complex. Bingham appeals his conviction for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 and 841(a)(1), and carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1). 2 The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. I. 3 Bingham argues that evidence obtained in a search of Apartment 9 should be suppressed because the officers' initial…