Schroeder v. Smythe

Good Law
29 F.3d 634·1994 WL 283678·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26140
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 199493-16238California1,538 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eric SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John SMYTHE, Warden; George W. Sumner, Director; Dan Lake, Grievance Specialist; Chuck Norwood, Grievance Officer; Jan Ahn, Unit Manager; Elwood Reynolds, H.C.F. Acting Administrator; John Does 1-10, State Employees; and Hawaii, State of P.S.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16238. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1994. * Decided June 24, 1994. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eric Schroeder appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, the State of Hawaii and various state employees at the Halawa Correctional Facility in Honolulu County, Hawaii. Schroeder argues that the district court erred in holding that his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights were not violated when prison officials restricted him to filing one grievance per day. We have jurisdiction pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.