Frederick A. Quihuis v. General Donald Owens

29 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederick A. QUIHUIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. General Donald OWENS, et al., Defendant/Appellees. No. 93-17299. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 22, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff Frederick A. Quihuis appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and state tort law claims arising out of the Arizona National Guard's failure to renew his enlistment contract and his dismissal from his employment with the Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Quihuis was employed for 12 years by the Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs as a security guard at the Papago Military Installation. His employment with DEMA was contingent on his maintaining his status as a guardsman in the Arizona National…