United States v. Arlon Chapman, United States of America v. Dun Alan O'COnnOr

29 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arlon CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dun Alan O'CONNOR, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30002, 93-30003. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 3, 1994. * Decided June 28, 1994. Before WRIGHT, CANBY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arlon Chapman and Dun O'Connor appeal the sentences imposed upon them following their guilty pleas to several drug related offenses. They argue that the sentencing judge misapplied provisions of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We vacate Chapman's sentence and remand his case for resentencing. We affirm O'Connor's sentence. BACKGROUND 3 Appellants, along with six other persons, were indicted for numerous alleged drug-related offenses. Chapman ultimately pleaded guilty to three counts of cocaine distribution, and four counts of marijuana…