United States v. Martin Flores-Juarez, AKA Manuel Gonzalez

Good Law
29 F.3d 635·1994 WL 384598·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26276
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 199493-10366California636 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin FLORES-JUAREZ, aka Manuel Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-10366. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 22, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Defendant Martin Flores-Juarez appeals the sentence and fine imposed on him for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Flores-Juarez waived the right to appeal his sentence. We therefore dismiss his appeal. I. 3 On March 5, 1993, Flores-Juarez pleaded guilty to possessing 78 kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a). As part of the related plea agreement, the government agreed to recommend a three level reduction for acceptance of responsibility at sentencing. The plea agreement also contained the following waiver of Flores-Juarez' appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.