United States v. Dennis Eugene Gardner

Good Law
29 F.3d 635·1994 WL 268668·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26247
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 199493-56143California381 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Eugene GARDNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-56143. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 16, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNADEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dennis E. Gardner, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 In October 1989, Gardner pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). In January 1990, the district court sentenced Gardner to a fourteen-year term of imprisonment. In his section 2255 motion, Gardner argued that his sentence was illegal because it exceeded the twelve-year statutory maximum for Class C felonies set forth in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3581 . 4 This court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.