United States v. Rojelio Hinojosa-Torres

29 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rojelio HINOJOSA-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50473. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 21, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rogelio Hinojosa-Torres appeals his convictions following a jury trial for conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. Counsel for Hinojosa-Torres filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identifies two issues for review: (1) whether the district court erred by denying Hinojosa-Torres' motion to suppress his confession; and (2) whether the government presented sufficient evidence to support the convictions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm the conviction and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. 3 *…