United States v. Richard Frederick

29 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard FREDERICK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10502. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 13, 1994. * Decided July 15, 1994. Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Frederick appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Frederick claims that the district court erred in admitting two items of evidence; that insufficient evidence supports his conviction; and that the district court erred by increasing his base offense level for possession of firearms. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 ; 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 , and we affirm. 3 * Frederick argues that the district court erred in permitting Agent Wisenor to testify as to the contents of a document seized in the course of a Customs search of a motor home Frederick…