United States v. Carl Richard Holmes

29 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Richard HOLMES Defendant-Appellant No. 93-50392. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 7, 1994. Decided June 22, 1994. Before: BROWNING, PREGERSON, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Carl Richard Holmes ("Holmes") appeals his jury conviction and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g). I. Facts 3 Acting on an informant's tip that Holmes was in possession of a firearm, Detective Huggins ("Huggins") of the El Cajon Police Department contacted Holmes' parole officer, John Moore ("Moore"). Holmes was, at the time, a convicted felon and was prohibited from possessing firearms. Moore testified that, following Holmes' release from prison, he had conducted a parole search of Holmes' residence. Holmes' parole conditions contained a…