United States v. Dolores Fernando Cocoa-Tapia, United States of America v. Jacinto Orozco-Morales

Good Law
29 F.3d 635·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26254
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 199493-10211California1,544 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dolores Fernando COCOA-TAPIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacinto OROZCO-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10211, 93-10212. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 16, 1994. Decided July 11, 1994. 1 Before D.W. NELSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and LETTS * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Fernando Cocoa-Tapia and Jacinto Orozco-Morales appeal their convictions of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846. They argue that the district court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence, in not permitting cross examination of a government agent who violated a Rule 615 order, and in denying their motions to dismiss the indictment for alleged grand jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.