United States v. One 1986 Ford Pickup

Good Law
29 F.3d 636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 1994636California351 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 636 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ONE 1986 FORD PICKUP, CA License No. 2W03753, VIN2FTJW36L6GCA99688, Its Tools and Appurtenances, Defendant, Ernie R. Sanders, Claimant-Appellant. No. 93-55904. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 16, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernie R. Sanders, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 On December 10, 1992, the district court entered final judgment in this action. Sanders subsequently filed a Rule 60(b) motion for reconsideration, which the district court denied on February 5, 1993. On February 9, 1993, Sanders filed a notice of appeal challenging both decisions. On May 18, 1993, Sanders filed a second Rule 60(b) motion. The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.