United States v. Jimmie L. Kendall

Good Law
29 F.3d 636·1994 WL 379193·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26292
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 199493-35848California683 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 636 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmie L. KENDALL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-35848. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 20, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jimmie L. Kendall, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for manufacturing methamphetamine, distributing methamphetamine, and carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 , and we review de novo. United States v. Moore, 921 F.2d 207, 209 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm. 3 Kendall first contends that his convictions are invalid because methamphetamine in other than liquid form was never properly redesignated as a Schedule II drug. Therefore, he argues, methamphetamine remains a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.