Rodolfo Velasquez v. United States Postal Service

29 F.3d 637 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rodolfo VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17041. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 20, 1994. 1 Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Rodolfo Velasquez appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action alleging that the United States Postal Service ("Postal Service") illegally and unconstitutionally required him to work on various federal holidays, failed to pay him for those holidays, and issued a disciplinary letter to him. Velasquez contends that the district court erred by concluding that it lacked subject jurisdiction over his action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 4 We review de novo the district court's determination regarding subject matter jurisdiction. Reebok Int'l. v. Marnatech Enters., 970 F.2d 552 , 554 (9th Cir.1992). 5…