Vicron Ii, Inc. v. Wellcorp International

Good Law
29 F.3d 637·1994 WL 374249·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26523
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 199492-17034California2,799 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 637 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. VICRON II, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WELLCORP INTERNATIONAL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17034. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 15, 1994. Decided July 15, 1994. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and LETTS, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada wherein Judge Howard D. McKibben granted the motion of Appellee Primark Corporation ("Primark") for a directed verdict pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a). This court has jurisdiction over Vicron's appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. I. 4 In 1986, Laurel Bigelow and John Beresford formed Vicron, Incorporated ("Vicron"). Laurel Bigelow became the president of Vicron, Jewell Roberts the vice-president, and John Beresford the secretary. Vicron developed and marketed computer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.