United States v. Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez

29 F.3d 637 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rene Martin VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5462. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. Decided June 22, 1994. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rejection of Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Aug. 5, 1994. Before: BROWNING, D.W. NELSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 In United States v. Alvarez-Machain, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of another Ninth Circuit panel which relied exclusively on our prior decision in the present case. 112 S.Ct. 2188, 2190-91 (1992), rev'g 946 F.2d 1466 (9th Cir.1991). The Court thus disapproved our earlier decision and, accordingly, vacated that decision and remanded "for further consideration in light of United States v. Alvarez-Machain." United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 112 S.Ct. 2986 (1992), vacating 939 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir.1991). 3 Verdugo's…