Linda Mae Vivian v. Susan Poole, Warden Attorney General of California

29 F.3d 637 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Linda Mae VIVIAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Susan POOLE, Warden; Attorney General of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-55081. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 21, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Linda Mae Vivian, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging her conviction following a guilty plea to second degree murder. Vivian contends that the State of California (State) administered psychotropic drugs against her will; her guilty plea was involuntary; prosecutorial misconduct, evidentiary rulings and the denial of a free trial transcript prejudiced her constitutional right to a fair trial; and she received ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 and affirm. 3 We review de novo the…