Frank E. Voth v. Manfred F. Maass

29 F.3d 637 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank E. VOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manfred F. MAASS; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-36079. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 18, 1994. * Decided July 26, 1994. Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oregon state prisoner Frank E. Voth appeals pro se the district court's (1) order granting defendant prison officials' motion to inspect Voth's medical records, (2) denial of Voth's motion for a mediation and settlement conference, (3) denial of Voth's motion for appointment of an attorney and expert witness, and (4) summary judgment in favor of defendants in Voth's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm in part and reverse in part. 3 * Motion to Inspect Medical Records 4 Voth contends that the district court erred by granting defendants' motion to inspect his medical records because defendants did…