Cleophas White v. Connell Olds-Pontiac-Gmc

Good Law
29 F.3d 638·1994 WL 316036·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26339
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199493-16467California1,311 words

Opinion

Opinion

29 F.3d 638 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cleophas WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONNELL OLDS-PONTIAC-GMC, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16467. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided June 30, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Cleophas White appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Connell Olds-Pontiac-GMC ("Connell"); United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 1179 ("the Union"); Bill Silva, the Union Representative; and Yates Kendrick, the Union Director; in White's action pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), as amended, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185 et seq., alleging wrongful termination against Connell and breach of the duty of fair representation against the Union. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. BACKGROUND 3 Connell hired White as an automobile salesman on April 20, 1991. While…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.