Gulf Insurance Company v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Gulf Insurance Company v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Company

Good Law
30 F.3d 139
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 199492-36900California1,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

30 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GULF INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. GULF INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-36900, 92-36901. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 1994. Decided Aug. 4, 1994. Before: TANG, FERGUSON, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The City of McMinnville, Oregon, was one of many defendants in the Washington Public Power Supply System Securities litigation ("WPPSS"). McMinnville was covered by three insurance policies: Gulf's Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policy ("Liability policy"), International Surplus Lines Insurance Company's ("ISLIC") Public Officer's and Employees Insurance Policy, and Gulf's Commercial Umbrella Catastrophe Liability policy ("Umbrella policy"). McMinnville tendered its defense in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.