Gaylin Burleson v. Steve Cambra, Interim Warden at California Medical Facility

30 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gaylin BURLESON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steve CAMBRA, Interim Warden at California Medical Facility, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-16808. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 14, 1994. * Decided Aug. 2, 1994. Before: LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM *** I. Delayed Arraignment. Burleson first argues that he was never arraigned at all. This is incorrect. Certain California court records incorrectly reflected that Burleson was arraigned in Siskiyou Justice Court on July 30, 1985, the date his codefendant was arraigned. In fact, he was later arraigned in Superior Court on December 23, 1985. There is no federal right to an arraignment in California Justice Court as opposed to California Superior Court. 1 Burleson next argues that the delay between his arrest for escaping from jail and his arrest and arraignment for the mini-mart robbery deprived…