Subroto Roy v. University of Hawaii

30 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Subroto ROY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, et al. Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16385. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1994. Decided July 29, 1994. Before: POOLE, CANBY and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Subroto Roy was an untenured professor of economics with the University of Hawaii-Manoa. The University received student complaints about his performance and elected not to renew his contract, allegedly because of performance-related deficiencies. Roy sued, alleging national origin discrimination and a deprivation of due process. After a bench trial, the district court determined that he had not been discriminated against because of his national origin. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Roy argues that the decision not to process the students' complaint against him through the University's M-4527 grievance…