United States v. Roberta L. Davison

Good Law
30 F.3d 140·1994 WL 408242
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 199493-30210California1,280 words

Opinion

Opinion

30 F.3d 140 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberta L. DAVISON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30210. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 1, 1994. * Decided Aug. 4, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Washington, D.C. No. CR-92-00211-WFN; Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Wash., 821 F.Supp. 1400 . AFFIRMED. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roberta L. Davison appeals her jury conviction of witness tampering and solicitation to commit witness tampering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 373 and 1512(b)(2)(A). She argues that the district court erred in allowing the government to question a witness about Davison's propensity for violence and preventing Davison from questioning the witness about the witness' own propensity for violence, that the district court improperly instructed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.