Naranjo-Aguilera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
30 F.3d 1106·94 Daily Journal DAR 10253·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18301·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5584
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 22, 199492-16653California4,766 words

Opinion

Opinion

30 F.3d 1106 Francisco NARANJO-AGUILERA; Candelario Orozco-Macias; Juventino Tafolla-Ramirez; Hector Orozco-Flores; Celestino Gaona, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos. 92-16653, 92-16933. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 1994. Decided July 22, 1994. Stephen A. Rosenbaum, California Rural Legal Assistance, San Francisco, CA, Bruce Goldstein, Farmworker Justice Fund, Inc., Washington, DC, Charles Wheeler and Karen Miksch, National Immigration Law Center, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants. 1 Donald E. Keener, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellants-cross-appellees. 2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 3 Before: FLETCHER and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 4 Opinion by Judge FLETCHER. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 5 This is a class action challenge to Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) interpretations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.